Larry Bradley's Weekly Ezine #63
Exploring Just How Stupid Are We?
Finding Common Ground Through Separation
Exploring Just How Stupid Are We?
Preparing for my interview this week with Rick Shenkman, the author of Just How Stupid Are We?: Facing the Truth about the American Voter, led to the discovery of a kindred mind working on the same problem from a different direction, yet reaching some of the same conclusions.
I thought one quote from his book applies to us all. "When our side loses an election we may want to throw a shoe at the television as we bemoan our fate to be born in a country so stupid as to have elected So and So."
How about this quote? "A great fear expressed by the Founders was that ordinary people would use their power at the ballot box to confiscate the wealth of the wealth of the many and give it to the few. . ." Sound familiar? It should if you’ve been reading here and know how fear of loss is used by both political parties.
Shenkman’s book raises a whole host of issues. Perhaps the most consequential is why we are so unwilling to directly confront our own stupidity and what to do about—especially since we are so willing to talk about so many other things formally taboo for conversation.
I recommend his book. It’s newly out in paperback and available in stores and at Amazon.com
Finding Common Ground Through Separation
The topic of President Obama’s recent commencement address at Notre Dame illustrates several points I’ve been making here of late.
Let’s start with this. Is there anyone living in America today who wishes there were more abortions? The answer is probably yes, but you would have to search long and hard to find those few individuals. The reality is the vast majority would say no. So why do we have so much difficulty finding common ground with this topic? Here is my explanation.
Salespeople know all about sifting through a lot of "no’s" to get to a yes. Successful salespeople succeed because they can tolerate rejection. Rejection is the reason many people would not consider a career in sales.
For years now, abortion opponents have tried to persuade us abortion should be illegal and have been rejected. Americans have said, in essence, we don’t like abortions, we want there to be fewer abortions, but we do not think the process should be illegal. Frustrated by that rejection, opponents of abortion have reached the following conclusion: If we can’t persuade Americans to make abortion illegal, then we will take over the political process and force abortion to be illegal.
This small and narrow minded attitude is a threat to the sovereignty of our nation and our way of life.
Attorneys will tell you the landmark case on abortion (Roe v. Wade) was decided . . .
To be able to read the rest of the Ezine, please email customerservice@KindredMindsEnt.com and subscribe to our free weekly Ezine by providing your first and last name, an email address and your zip code. We will forward a copy of the complete text of this Ezine to you and you will receive all future editions in your in-box. We do not share our list of subscribers for any reason, You may unsubscribe at any time (as noted in the Administrative Instructions included with each Ezine) by replying to the Ezine with the word UNSUBSCRIBE anywhere in the subject line.
Once you have subscribed, we suggest you check your spam file in your email account to make sure you’re receiving your copy of our weekly Ezine.
Thank you in advance for becoming a member of our community seeking pragmatic solutions for our political problems by overcoming polarized politics.





The title: "Just how stupid are we?" resonates loud and clear -- the answer to the question is: purty durn stupid!
The good news is: we've always been purty durn stupid, I think. Stupid, but extremely lucky, at some most important times.
That "we are a stupid people" is a discouraging weight upon all thinking people, and I'm afraid many people are so discouraged that they have turned away from getting involved in corrective action, which only helps to perpetuate our huge difficulty.
Many young people, for example, are completely bypassing our political system, which they rightly believe is broken and is perhaps beyond repair.
The overwhelming influence of Big Money interests has corrupted both major political parties and, by and large, determines political decision-making.
The single best solution MAY be Fair Elections -- public campaign financing -- the reform that makes all other reform possible. A Fair Elections bill is now in Congress moving slowly. Fair elections, also called Clean Elections, will not be achieved without hugh public storm to overcome corporate-owned media and stranglehold on political process. We have a huge problem, including entertained but uninformed, misinformed, lethargic and at least somewhat disgusted citizenry which is NOT participating in the democratic process.
I can see no better way out of this mess but Fair/Clean Elections. But how to invigorate The People?
MORE ABOUT Fair/Clean Elections at website for Public Campaign: www.publicampaign.org
Thanks for your eNews, Larry Bradley.
Reply to this
Spence,
Thanks for your commentary.
Unless you choose to study government, the fact is the average citizen gets more sex education than they do civics education. Shenkman makes the point the study of Civics has taken a back seat to math and science.
Reading that, I had this thought. If we are not teaching Civics and Critical Thinking, then aren't we creating defenseless adults who are susceptible to manipulation by political demogogues?
I appreciate your commentary and vision for revising our electoral process. Such discussion is welcome.
For my part, I continue to believe the first step is to install Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) in all 50 states. Installing IRV will enable the creation of truly competitive third parties and break up the duopolies of the two major parties.
Part of creating those competitive third parties must mean educating people they must invest in their own political philosophy with small contributions to the party with the philosophy they support. After all, if you can get 40 million people to give $20 each, then you have $800 million to fund a campaign. That more than matches the contributions made by the political donor class and mutes their influence on the process.
You ask, " . . .how to invigorate the people?" That is the ultimate question, isn't it? Especially in the face of rampant stupidity.
Larry
Reply to this